YEAR
2002 Precipitation Totals (in inches)
January
1, 2002 through December 31, 2002:
Compared
to Normals
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Flagstaff
|
12.89
|
22.91
|
56.3%
|
-10.02
|
|
Phoenix
|
2.82
|
8.29
|
34.0%
|
-5.47
|
|
Tucson
|
7.84
|
12.17
|
64.4%
|
-4.33
|
|
Winslow
|
4.31
|
8.03
|
53.7%
|
-3.72
|
|
Yuma
|
0.03
|
3.17
|
0.9%
|
-3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Alamosa
|
4.42
|
7.25
|
61.0%
|
-2.83
|
|
Colorado
Springs
|
7.84
|
17.40
|
45.1%
|
-9.56
|
|
Denver
|
7.48
|
15.81
|
47.3%
|
-8.33
|
|
Grand
Junction
|
7.87
|
8.99
|
87.5%
|
-1.12
|
|
Pueblo
|
3.94
|
12.39
|
31.8%
|
-8.45
|
|
Vernal
|
6.25
|
8.77
|
71.3%
|
-2.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Concordia
|
18.02
|
28.43
|
63.4%
|
-10.41
|
|
Dodge
City
|
14.52
|
22.35
|
65.0%
|
-7.83
|
|
Goodland
|
9.91
|
19.76
|
50.2%
|
-9.85
|
|
Topeka
|
27.84
|
35.64
|
78.1%
|
-7.80
|
|
Wichita
|
33.43
|
30.38
|
110.0%
|
3.05
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Chadron
|
7.78
|
16.63
|
46.8%
|
-8.85
|
|
Grand
Island
|
17.14
|
25.89
|
66.2%
|
-8.75
|
|
Hastings
|
17.05
|
27.94
|
61.0%
|
-10.89
|
|
Kearney
|
11.80
|
25.20
|
46.8%
|
-13.40
|
|
Lincoln
|
26.62
|
28.37
|
93.8%
|
-1.75
|
|
Norfolk
|
19.98
|
26.66
|
74.9%
|
-6.68
|
|
North
Platte
|
11.07
|
19.66
|
56.3%
|
-8.59
|
|
Omaha
Eppley
|
26.06
|
30.22
|
86.2%
|
-4.16
|
|
Omaha
Valley
|
25.08
|
30.22
|
83.0%
|
-5.14
|
|
Scottsbluff
|
7.58
|
16.33
|
46.4%
|
-8.75
|
|
Sidney
|
12.14
|
18.78
|
64.6%
|
-6.64
|
|
Valentine
|
11.31
|
19.52
|
57.9%
|
-8.21
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Ely
|
4.52
|
9.97
|
45.3%
|
-5.45
|
|
Las
Vegas
|
1.44
|
4.49
|
32.1%
|
-3.05
|
|
Winnemucca
|
6.07
|
8.33
|
72.9%
|
-2.26
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
New
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Albuquerque
|
6.39
|
9.47
|
67.5%
|
-3.08
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
South
Dakota
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Aberdeen
|
15.56
|
20.22
|
77.0%
|
-4.66
|
|
Huron
|
14.88
|
20.9
|
71.2%
|
-6.02
|
|
Rapid
City Airport
|
10.28
|
16.64
|
61.8%
|
-6.36
|
|
Rapid
City
|
14.01
|
19.36
|
72.4%
|
-5.35
|
|
Sioux
Falls
|
24.07
|
24.69
|
97.5%
|
-0.62
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Salt
Lake City
|
10.29
|
16.5
|
62.4%
|
-6.21
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
|
City
|
Year
2002
|
Normal
|
%
|
Deficit
|
|
Casper
|
7.05
|
13.03
|
54.1%
|
-5.98
|
|
Cheyenne
|
9.87
|
15.45
|
63.9%
|
-5.58
|
|
Lander
|
8.09
|
13.42
|
60.3%
|
-5.33
|
|
Laramie
|
5.78
|
11.37
|
50.8%
|
-5.59
|
|
Rawlins
|
5.11
|
9.74
|
52.5%
|
-4.63
|
|
Riverton
|
5.93
|
8.68
|
68.3%
|
-2.75
|
Return
to:
S.W.
Drought Impacts Page